By Marian Oswald on December 26, As President Trump continues to unveil plans for his administration, many Americans brace themselves for dramatic changes to the educational system. Trump has not held back his criticism of the Department of Education, and instituting the school choice program appears to be high on his list of things to do. The impacts, both positive and negative, are expected to be dramatic. The Choice of Schools In theory, school choice offers parents of all socioeconomic statuses the same opportunity to provide their children with the best possible education.
The subsequent selection of Arne Duncan, the battle-tested former Chicago schools chief, as secretary of education provided a trusted, steady hand to lead the charge and take the flak.
The ARRA seemed to complete the constellation: So far, the vast majority of its funds have served to sustain the status quo, funding the most traditional line items and actually helping schools and districts go about their everyday business.
With one notable exception spurring long overdue changes in some state lawsthe implementation of this mammoth statute has confirmed several humbling, hoary lessons of federal policymaking, including the limited ability of Uncle Sam to drive education reform.
Simply by virtue of having students, states and districts would begin receiving funds. No grant competitions, no long, complicated applications, no review teams with complex scoring rubrics.
Despite the priority placed on getting lots of money out on the double, some policymakers were determined to see that these funds were also well spent.
Duncan went even further, repeatedly telling state leaders that these formula dollars had to be used to improve student learning and innovate, not merely fund more of the same.
Had everything gone according to Hoyle, this massive infusion of federal funds would have protected state and district education budgets from major cuts while advancing invaluable reforms by supporting new, innovative, and promising programs. But as is often the case in education policy, the best laid plans of Uncle Sam went awry.
The survey of administrators reported that most of the funds were merely repairing budget holes and that little if any reform was being accomplished. In September, the U. In October, the Obama administration announced that more than half of thejobs created or saved across the entire economy by the ARRA were in education.
Combined, they offer an unmistakable overarching lesson: Revised figures indicated that the U. Nationwide, unemployment topped 10 percent in October, considerably higher than most experts had anticipated.
State budgets were drastically affected. Regrettably, but predictably, education systems went into self-preservation mode.
Local education systems, particularly the largest urban districts, are infamously Byzantine, change-averse organizations.
External forces exacerbated these internal tendencies. In some cases, unions pressured policymakers to direct funds toward job protection. In Michigan, a local union sued a district over layoffs. Some in Montana sought to use stimulus funds to shore up teacher pensions, and the Utah Education Association ran television ads urging legislators to dedicate ARRA dollars to restoring education programs.
As a number of commentators have noted, the economic downturn offered school systems the opportunity to alter expensive, outdated practices such as strict salary schedules, protective tenure rules, and bloated pension programs. Though sensible in theory, this was probably wishful thinking when applied to the often confounding realities of K—12 politics and policy.The people who best know the education advocacy work of Betsy DeVos, the billionaire tapped by President-elect Donald Trump to be his education secretary, are in Michigan, where she has been.
Year-round Christian boarding school with counseling for girls ages who have life-controlling issues or poor academic performance.
To many education reformers, the passage of the federal government’s massive stimulus plan, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), appeared to be a final bright star falling into alignment. Education is the process of facilitating learning, or the acquisition of knowledge, skills, values, beliefs, and ashio-midori.comional methods include storytelling, discussion, teaching, training, and directed ashio-midori.comion frequently takes place under the guidance of educators, but learners may also educate themselves. Education can take place in . Education Reform Flexibility from No Child Left Behind Find out how states can get relief from provisions of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (NCLB) in exchange for efforts to close achievement gaps, promote rigorous accountability, and ensure that all students are on track to graduate college- .
Education reform is the name given to the goal of changing public ashio-midori.comically, reforms have taken different forms because the motivations of reformers have differed. However, since the s, education reform has been focused on changing the existing system from one focused on inputs to one focused on outputs (i.e., student achievement).
Math Education Reform: Does It Add Up? EdCast with Linda Hirsch and Jim Carney. Guest: Elizabeth Carson, Co-founder and Executive Director, NYC HOLD NATIONAL, interviews with Professors Fred Greenleaf and Sylvain Cappell, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, NYU.
BIE Launches New Strategic Direction The Bureau of Indian Education announced today the release of the BIE Strategic Direction for School choice exists today in a variety of forms, from charter schools, magnet schools, and district and state open enrollment plans to publicly and privately financed voucher plans.
Despite years of research and debate, the question of whether school choice improves student outcomes persists.